Dealing with Swamp Creatures: Prosecute, Imprison, Execute or Control?

Why not expose the Jeffery Epstein files?

Contrary to people like Bill and Hilary Clinton surrounded by a dead body count, President Donald Trump doesn’t kill people, or want to see them die or even imprison them.  That’s why Trump wants the war in Ukraine to stop and says, “I want the killing to stop.”  That’s why instead of executing illegal aliens who have committed capital crimes, Trump is deporting them.  That’s why when military intelligence knew the location of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Trump prevented Israeli forces from killing him.  If Trump allowed the killing of the Ayatollah, another one would replace him, but if you can control the one in place, then he will control the ones beneath him.  It is actually a good strategy, and it does stop the killing. 

Concerning people like the Clintons, should they be prosecuted?  People like the Clintons were not prosecuted for “Whitewater, Travelgate, Fostergate, Monica Lewinsky, Benghazi and more,” with over 80 people “committing suicide” around them.  Is there something afoot here, or are the Clintons just so nauseating that after people have anything to do with them, they commit suicide?

Let’s say you prosecute and imprison people like the Clintons.  If you don’t execute them, they will cause you a world of trouble from prison.  If you do execute them, then the next in line takes over with a vengeance, like one of the members of the party at the “wedding of Liberal Royalty.”  But if you control them with incriminating evidence, then you have a deal to try to keep them in line.

So how does any of this have anything to do with the Jeffery Epstein files and tapes?  Let’s think about this.  Having the incriminating goods on a lot of people and needing for certain things to happen, or for people to stop their threats, then you could hang prosecution and life imprisonment, or worse, over their heads to control them.

Could this be the “Art of the Deal” in dealing with swamp creatures?

What do we know about the Jeffery Epstein files?  There are those who claim Donald Trump flew on Epstein’s private plane.  From flight logs from the 1990s it appears true that Donald Trump did indeed fly on Epstein’s airplane at least seven times, according to federal flight records, but it is false to state that Trump ever visited Epstein’s private island, for the flight logs clearly show this did not happen.  Even left-leaning Politifact says that it is “false” to say Trump “has been to Epstein’s island.”  In 2019 Trump stated that he and Epstein had a “falling out” years ago and Trump stated, “I don’t think I’ve spoke to him for 15 years, I wasn’t a fan.”  In fact, Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago.  A club member said Mr. Trump “kicked Epstein out after Epstein harassed the daughter of a member.”

Now Bill Clinton is a different story.  One of the females trafficked by Epstein, Virginia Giuffre, “has said in an affidavit that [Bill] Clinton was also present on… Epstein’s private island.”  Unfortunately, while happily married, a mother of three, and a “fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse,” at age 41, Giuffre supposedly “died by suicide,” which was the third witness in the Epstein case to “die by suicide.”  That sounds like the Clinton trademark.

Clinton took at least nine flights on Epstein’s “infamous airplane.”

Johanna Sjoberg, another victim of Epstein, in court testimony stated, “[Epstein] said one time that Clinton likes them young,” referring to girls.

Not wishing harm on anyone, I wonder how long it will be before Sjoberg and Ghislaine Maxwell “commit suicide.”

In his New York City townhouse, Epstein hung “Parsing Bill,” an oil painting of Bill Clinton in a blue dress.

Then you have Joe Biden, whose brother James owned three parcels of land on Water’s island just 8 miles from Epstein Island, which was a favorite vacation spot for Joe Biden.  It’s interesting that a billionaire, reported to have traveled to Epstein Island, hosted a fund raiser for Joe Biden, and another billionaire, who reportedly visited Epstein Island, gave nearly $700,000 to Biden’s re-election fund.  Biden’s CIA director met with Epstein “multiple times.”

So, why might you not want to expose the Epstein files?

It is amazing if you look at all the court cases trying to block Trump’s administration’s agenda. In fact, there were 220 lawsuits in just the first 100 days.  The Associated Press published a record of the — now — 229 cases as of July 15, 2025.  Mathematically analyzing the AP report shows that of all the cases brought against Trump’s agenda, 34% were from Clinton appointed judges, 31% were brought from Biden appointed judges, and 9% were brought from Obama appointed justices.  That means that 74% of the judges bringing cases against Trump’s agenda are from justices appointed by Clinton, Biden, or Obama.  Please note that there are also Reagan appointed justices, W. Bush appointed justices, H.W. Bush appointed justices, and Trump appointed justices, with the latter making up 0% of the cases.  In some of these cases the court either “partially or fully blocked Trump’s agenda,” “left it in effect,” or “the case is still pending.”

Focusing upon the 100 cases where the Trump agenda was either “fully or partially blocked,” 32% were from Clinton appointed justices, 31% were from Biden appointed justices and 9% were from Obama appointed justices.  That means 72% of the cases blocking Trump’s agenda are from justices appointed by Clinton, Biden or Obama.  The agenda of these justices, with lifetime appointments, appears to be politically driven.  If a politician was influencing the opinions of these justices, imagine how that influence might change, if someone else was holding all the “trump cards,” so to say.  Regardless, if there were some way to influence Clinton, Biden or Obama, more of Trump’s agenda could begin moving across the country.

Could Trump’s Truth Social posting of one of the “Clinton body count” videos have been a “shot across the bow” to the Clintons?

You have to stop and think about it.  If Trump says that there is nothing more with the Epstein case, then perhaps there is nothing more, but if he is lying to us, could it be for a good reason and for the good of the country?  You have to remember that Trump is a billionaire and could be out on his yacht in the Caribbean with his beautiful wife, children and grandchildren, but instead he endured numerous law suites as a second time candidate, with some people asking, “Has anyone been sued more than Donald Trump?”  On top of all of the hassles of lawfare, Trump took a bullet through his ear and still did not quit, but instead got up, pumped his fist and said, “fight, fight, fight.”  Therefore, the only reason that Donald Trump sought the presidency and is serving as president is because he has a heart for the people and America. 

Given all of this, President Trump deserves a little room on whatever his decision is concerning the Epstein files, and if ever a president deserved our trust — President Donald Trump does.